“Why did they have to say Osama Bin Laden was killed? Why could they not allow him to be "captured"? Because then he would have spilled the beans - that he had no part of the 9-11 Bombing!!” -Hamid Gul
Globalist think-tanks are already building a case against Pakistanby Tony Cartalucci
May 3, 2011Foundation for the Defense of Democracy (FDD) scribe and all around intellectually dishonest propagandist, Bill Roggio of the "Long War Journal," has dedicated his life to perpetuating the entirely fake "War on Terror," abandoning all objectivity with the very name of his now officially government funded, Neo-Conservative establishment affiliated blog. The term "Long War" of course is a throwback to the Bush era and constant reassurances by the president that indeed the "War on Terror" will be endless.
"Osama's mansion:" Looking more like an LA crack house, it is more
likely that it was a CIA building hosting an "exercise" that went
"live" at the cost of multiple, unsuspecting lives. Of course, this is
just as credible as government claims which are based on evidence
either photoshopped, burned to the ground or at the bottom of the sea.
FDD and their doppelganger organization Foreign Policy Initiative -- essentially the reincarnation of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) -- were amongst the first in the wake of Obama's announcement to begin implicating Pakistan for harboring Bin Laden leading up to his death. These calls have only intensified.Roggio's recent article, "Pakistani complicity in sheltering Osama bin Laden is evident" lays out what appears to be a convincing argument that not only was Pakistan aware of Bin Laden's presence in the city of Abbotabad, the center of Pakistan's military and intelligence community, but were complicit in providing him with sanctuary. Roggio is quick to remind readers of Pakistan's "vast links to terrorist groups."Despite arguing that Pakistan was knowingly harboring the most notorious fugitive in human history, Roggio suggests that the US kept the operation a complete secret from Pakistani intelligence until the operation itself was underway -- and even then -- the US did not reveal the location of the operation because of a supposed lack of trust. Unfettered, Roggio skips past this lapse of logic either out of his own lack of imagination or his utter contempt for his readership. Of course, if Osama Bin Laden was actually in Abbotabad, and Pakistan was providing him sanctuary, wouldn't the compound itself be under constant watch? At the very least, after the operation was announced to Pakistani officials, wouldn't they already know the exact location?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/“Why did they have to say Osama Bin Laden was killed? Why could they not allow him to be "captured"? Because then he would have spilled the beans - that he had no part of the 9-11 Bombing!!” -Hamid Gul Globalist think-tanks are already building a case against Pakistan by Tony Cartalucci Prisonplane ...